From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:50:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83sihga4oy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r3x2qyjg.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83d28lddvm.fsf@gnu.org> <87389hrey8.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83lhn9bx9u.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4r9pw8g.fsf@wanadoo.es> <85lhn8hq6t.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416325876 19483 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2014 15:51:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Leake Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 18 16:51:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xql3c-0006LQ-9X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:51:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xql3b-00086z-JT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:51:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34331) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xql36-00081U-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:50:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xql2z-0004r2-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:50:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:41131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xql2z-0004qv-Lj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:50:29 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF800400RYOLG00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:50:28 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF8004BUS03B650@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:50:28 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <85lhn8hq6t.fsf@stephe-leake.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177570 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Leake > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 02:24:10 -0600 > > I built emacs pretest 24.3.93, .94 successfully on Windows 7 64 bit > MSYS2 mingw32, but emacs-dynamic-module failed as above on the same > MSYS2 tools. So I think the problem is in the emacs code, although it > may be a change that encounters an MSYS bug. The only part of the Emacs code that could have any relation to this is unexw32.c. Does temacs.tmp (which is the output of the linker) run?