From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Generating the ChangeLog files from the commit messages Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:32:36 +0200 Message-ID: <83sih08m57.fsf@gnu.org> References: <21606.10799.112099.788101@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1753218.Ot8JCqssfN@descartes> <546AABCF.8030705@cs.ucla.edu> <9xioico2nm.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k32s9zm5.fsf@gnu.org> <547A4A1B.9060807@cs.ucla.edu> <20141130101201.3a2625e6@forcix> <547B4285.8070901@cs.ucla.edu> <83wq6c8s47.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417379584 31650 80.91.229.3 (30 Nov 2014 20:33:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 20:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, forcer@forcix.cx To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 30 21:32:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XvBAu-0003UJ-86 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 21:32:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51709 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvBAt-0006tJ-RG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:32:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvBAd-0006t7-N3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:32:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvBAY-0003Pk-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:32:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:59434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvBAY-0003Nt-2v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:32:34 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NFV00B00CL5FC00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:31:18 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NFV003LSD05J480@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:31:18 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178542 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Stefan Monnier , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, forcer@forcix.cx, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 19:30:47 +0100 > > But I wonder whether it's feasible to make that a dynamic limit? Do we > have a way to ask the OS how much (physical-ish) RAM it has? If it's a > 64GiB machine, it might make sense to make the limit higher than if it's > a 16MiB machine. I'm not sure this is only about available memory. This warning caught my typing mistakes a few times. It could also be a security feature.