From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to remove INTERNAL_FIELD? Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:56:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83sibr15ac.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lhhjuq26.fsf@gmail.com> <5538C48F.2020005@cs.ucla.edu> <87fv7rupcc.fsf@gmail.com> <5538C6C0.2000609@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429786645 21147 80.91.229.3 (23 Apr 2015 10:57:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ohwoeowho@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 23 12:57:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YlEom-0000hB-BP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:57:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39433 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlEol-0008Pt-Gy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:57:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlEoZ-0008OS-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlEoW-0003vi-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:42141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlEoV-0003vL-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:56:59 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NN900E009X0FW00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:52:01 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NN900EXQA6POH00@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:52:01 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5538C6C0.2000609@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185800 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 03:17:36 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Oleh Krehel wrote: > > Should it be 'foo' or 'foo_'? > > The former, surely. There should be no need for the trailing underscore. Please don't forget to change src/.gdbinit to follow suit. There's nothing more annoying than have .gdbinit commands broken by such changes, since you discover this in the middle of a debugging session, and they manifest themselves by cryptic error messages.