From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lisp watchpoints Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 05:32:39 +0200 Message-ID: <83si3x1jc8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wpt922dn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448249593 12223 80.91.229.3 (23 Nov 2015 03:33:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 03:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 23 04:33:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a0hsC-0004Wf-JF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 04:33:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58462 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0hsC-0000Jp-MD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 22:33:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0hs0-0000Jg-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 22:32:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0hrx-0004WB-OX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 22:32:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:45448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0hrx-0004W7-Gc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 22:32:45 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NY800J00ZODHL00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 05:32:44 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NY900JZ10IKF150@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 05:32:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195094 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Noam Postavsky , jwiegley@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 16:25:40 -0500 > > [ Reminds me: did I understand correctly that you found gethash to be > faster than Fmemq on redisplay--variables? Yes. > For such a small number of elements, I find it really surprising, > since I thought the generally expected "threshold" where gethash > is faster than assq was somewhere in the order of a hundred > elements. ] That's not what I saw.