From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next release from master Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:04:16 +0200 Message-ID: <83si0z7ycv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56BCB6B3.2020809@alice.it> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455224675 18067 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2016 21:04:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 22:04:34 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyPg-0007UU-QA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:04:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53564 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyPg-0002Ov-8J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:04:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyPd-0002OK-0B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:04:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyPc-0006sA-4g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:04:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyPY-0006rI-9c; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:04:24 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4969 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyPX-0000E2-CW; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:04:23 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:09:46 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199775 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:09:46 -0500 > Cc: Emacs developers > > I'm interested to hear what the core developers want: anyone who commits more > than once in a blue moon, which option do you want? I think what Mark suggested makes the most sense, and fits best our scarce resources and also (to some extent) past practices. All the alternatives are significantly more complex, and I don't believe we will be able to sustain them, the way we currently work.