From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Code reviews
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:51:34 +0200
Message-ID: <83si00rjzd.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <rrd1v05yaj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <56BE7E37.3090708@cs.ucla.edu>
	<4hd1rw1ubr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<nz60x22nt2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<83vb50wxhv.fsf@gnu.org> <m3a8mcdjjx.fsf@gnus.org>
	<m2io0zz56d.fsf@newartisans.com> <87y49vz4cg.fsf@acer.localhost.com>
	<m2oaarxojf.fsf_-_@newartisans.com> <87vb4zb0i4.fsf@gnu.org>
	<837fheuu6a.fsf@gnu.org> <877fheb1rh.fsf@wanadoo.es>
	<87ziua9mwq.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83h9git36k.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87vb4y9ep9.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83a8mat2aa.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87r3fm9du0.fsf@wanadoo.es>
	<jwvy49tr79u.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org>
	<83oaaprmmb.fsf@gnu.org>
	<jwvoaapndwi.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457455915 9493 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2016 16:51:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:51:55 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 08 17:51:44 2016
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1adKrD-00067y-N3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 17:51:39 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35908 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1adKr8-0005Tx-61
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:51:34 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54236)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1adKr4-0005SG-3n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:51:30 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1adKr0-00086D-7Y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:51:30 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42974)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1adKr0-000867-3T; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:51:26 -0500
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2911
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1adKqz-0004f1-FP; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:51:25 -0500
In-reply-to: <jwvoaapndwi.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org> (message from
	Stefan Monnier on Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:21:42 -0500)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201176
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/201176>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:21:42 -0500
> 
> I was thinking here about focusing on the commit-message reviewing

That would better be served by a separate mailing list where patches
are posted for such a review.