From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing bugs from the blockers Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 20:51:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83shxh51sc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160509235343.17047.73943@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20160509235343.759D0220128@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <831t569wwu.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg96l06p.fsf@gnus.org> <83lh3e82sw.fsf@gnu.org> <8760uhlng5.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463421196 6448 80.91.229.3 (16 May 2016 17:53:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 16 19:53:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b2Mhe-0007vQ-9I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 19:53:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45632 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2MhY-00025M-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2MgY-0000VR-B9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:52:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2MgT-0000rO-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2MgT-0000qR-C9; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2453 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b2MgQ-0006ll-4D; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:51:59 -0400 In-reply-to: <8760uhlng5.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 13 May 2016 22:20:26 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203864 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 22:20:26 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I didn't set the indication, so I don't feel myself authorized to > > remove it unilaterally. > > Everybody involved in Emacs can set the blockiness, so everybody > involved in Emacs should feel enabled to remove blockiness, I think. > It's all (mostly) just a matter of taste and opinion, after all. Yes, and the above is _my_ opinion (and the way I like to do business in community projects in general).