From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should fixes for Bug#23936 go also to emacs-25? Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:14:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83shv3xbus.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8360rzysdq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469114115 28408 80.91.229.3 (21 Jul 2016 15:15:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 21 17:15:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFgw-0004AO-DE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:15:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41434 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFgv-0005Pk-Lk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:15:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFfj-0005N3-I6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:14:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFfi-00065K-O8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:13:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFfi-00065F-Kl; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:13:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4968 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bQFfg-0003UV-Qd; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:13:57 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Tino Calancha on Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:01:03 +0900 (JST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205967 Archived-At: > From: Tino Calancha > Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:01:03 +0900 (JST) > cc: Tino Calancha , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Documentation fixes that are relevant to the behavior on emacs-25 > > should be pushed to emacs-25. > Thank you Eli for the answer. > The doc fixes in Bug#23936 are not relevant to the behaviour > on emacs-25; they seems not urgent at all. Urgency is not an issue when documentation fixes are concerned. What matters is whether the changes make the documentation better. Of course, if the behavior whose description you want to improve/correct is only available on master, then the change shouldn't be pushed to emacs-25. Thanks.