From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there a sane way to type Hebrew with nikud with Emacs 25/Mac? Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 05:44:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83shpsbih4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1481056342.3486002.810530185.08361AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1481151750.3863289.811957801.45609D8B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83h96fhysl.fsf@gnu.org> <1481576998.3109775.816718105.3FD7FFFA@webmail.messagingengine.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481600676 20009 195.159.176.226 (13 Dec 2016 03:44:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 03:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Mark H. David" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 04:44:32 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cGe11-00040G-DZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 04:44:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35144 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGe12-0000tc-NJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:44:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGe0w-0000tG-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:44:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGe0t-0006u1-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:44:26 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38771) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGe0t-0006tt-Ke; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:44:23 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1539 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cGe0l-0006wt-US; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:44:16 -0500 In-reply-to: <1481576998.3109775.816718105.3FD7FFFA@webmail.messagingengine.com> (mhd@yv.org) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210394 Archived-At: > From: "Mark H. David" > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:09:58 -0800 > > First approximation: when a key K comes in to Emacs, and not using US keyboard > and K is not defined in Emacs, reinterpret K with corresponding character in US keyboard > combined with modifier bits of of K. The problem is, the US keyboard key that corresponds to a given character is not easily deduced, AFAIK, because different localized keyboards have slight variations in their layout.