From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:16:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83sho429zr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485505096 24082 195.159.176.226 (27 Jan 2017 08:18:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 27 09:18:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1jT-0005dS-Ds for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:18:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43642 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1jY-0006Lc-Os for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:18:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1jT-0006LJ-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1jO-00060O-CP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1jO-00060I-9L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1jO-0004KK-2x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25542 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25542-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25542.148550502516569 (code B ref 25542); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 08:17:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1iS-0004JB-QG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:17:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58407) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1iR-0004If-TW for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:17:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1iH-0005Vb-La for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:16:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1iH-0005VW-Hy; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:16:53 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3965 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1iG-00012j-Ku; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:16:53 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Dani Moncayo on Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:03:41 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128647 Archived-At: > From: Dani Moncayo > Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:03:41 +0100 > Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org > > > (2) How do the frames from before step 2 and after step 3 differ? > > Please use M-: (frame-geometry) and post the ‘outer-position’ and > > ‘outer-size’ values. > > The frames are exactly equal. Both in size and positon on the screen. This seems to contradict your original report, where you said the two frames had different sizes. Or maybe you are saying that the above 2 functions return the same values, but the actual values are different?