From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: status of emacs-25 branch Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 19:03:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83shjynqmz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mvalc483.fsf@gnu.org> <83fugdbfzj.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvakppt2.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83r2zwa759.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495382772 16154 195.159.176.226 (21 May 2017 16:06:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 21 18:06:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTMt-000463-2k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 18:06:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38649 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTMy-0004Wz-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:06:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTKz-00037q-B9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:04:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTKv-00048d-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:04:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44909) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTKv-00048Z-1A; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:04:05 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3730 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dCTKu-0000Rb-1V; Sun, 21 May 2017 12:04:04 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Sun, 21 May 2017 11:37:42 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215055 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord), rgm@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 11:37:42 -0400 > > EZ> Once that decision is made, we should next decide whether Emacs 26.1 > EZ> should wait for some unexec solution or not. If it should wait, we cannot > EZ> yet cut a release branch based on master. > > I don't think we need to wait for that in particular. It might be nice to get > a new release out with the threading support, start gaining some experience > for that change, while we continue to get unexec ready. OK, thanks. I kinda agree. But meanwhile we had this nasty bug#26952 reported against Emacs 25.2, so I'd like first to see if we can have an emergency Emacs 25.3 release.