From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28008: 25.2; Resume kmacro definition errors C-u C-u Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:00:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83shgyqmwn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d1867hpd.fsf@calancha-pc> <87d182p97t.fsf@calancha-pc> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1502456562 28890 195.159.176.226 (11 Aug 2017 13:02:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: vianchielfaura@gmail.com, 28008@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 11 15:02:34 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9Zz-0006KP-Td for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:02:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38088 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9a4-0007sZ-D7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:02:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9Zm-0007lO-Nk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:02:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9Zi-00039s-RD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:02:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46501) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9Zi-00039o-OT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9Zi-0007bj-Df for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28008 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28008-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28008.150245648629202 (code B ref 28008); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28008) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Aug 2017 13:01:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55182 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9Z7-0007av-Le for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:01:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9Z5-0007ai-HG for 28008@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:01:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9Yw-0002T2-A2 for 28008@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:01:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9Yw-0002Sx-78; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:01:14 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4652 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dg9Yu-0004Pz-Sg; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:01:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <87d182p97t.fsf@calancha-pc> (message from Tino Calancha on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 21:41:58 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:135652 Archived-At: > From: Tino Calancha > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 28008@debbugs.gnu.org, tino.calancha@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 21:41:58 +0900 > > ** Patch 1 always save the macro in `last-kbd-macro' after an error or 'C-g'. > Then, A. B. and D.2 behaves similarly. > > ** Patch 2 adds a new variable `last-aborted-kbd-macro': it saves the partial > macro there after an error or 'C-g'. Called `start-kbd-macro' with > APPEND non-nil offers to append on `last-aborted-kbd-macro'; possible answers > are 'yes', 'no' or 'del' (i.e., append on `last-aborted-kbd-macro' after delete > its last character). > > This is not backward compatible; for instance, the snippets A, B above won't be > saved in `last-kbd-macro' (currently they do). > It's more tidy; it separates 'good macros', i.e. those ended after > 'F4' or 'C-x )', from 'partial macros', i.e., those ended after an error or 'C-g'. All these low-level changes just to support an obscure use case? Is really worth the risk to break macros to cater to that? Thanks.