From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33275: 27.0.50; Image cache pruning Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 18:23:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83sh0fcx2r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83va5bcxxu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1541435060 15848 195.159.176.226 (5 Nov 2018 16:24:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33275@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 05 17:24:16 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhfj-00040r-Mm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 17:24:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36082 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhhq-00047G-0G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:26:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhgZ-0003Cm-8Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhgV-0006Hf-1f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:25:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhgT-0006Fa-Qz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhgT-0004u1-J8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:25:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 16:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33275 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33275-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33275.154143504518779 (code B ref 33275); Mon, 05 Nov 2018 16:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33275) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2018 16:24:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35488 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhfU-0004sT-6H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:24:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34764) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhfP-0004sE-2H for 33275@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:23:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhfF-0003M2-Sv for 33275@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:23:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhfD-0003H3-HS; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:23:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2762 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhfD-0006wH-7u; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:23:43 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 05 Nov 2018 17:18:47 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152059 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 33275@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 17:18:47 +0100 > > If you visit a, say, 16GB file, then, indeed, it's expected that Emacs > grows to 16GB (or more). But if you're just calling `image-size' on a > bunch of files (each of which is a lot smaller than that), it's rather > unexpected that that's going to blow up Emacs. What was the sum of sizes of all the files you used to reproduce the problem?