From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GDI+ take 3 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:46:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83sgh4g3af.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86h7xzc5ai.fsf@csic.es> <83d08mt7gy.fsf@gnu.org> <83eesrkivc.fsf@gnu.org> <865ze3wvk8.fsf@csic.es> <837dyihyjc.fsf@gnu.org> <877dyh28ci.fsf@tcd.ie> <83o8rthnvr.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhbdwx1c.fsf@tcd.ie> <83mu7dgtls.fsf@gnu.org> <83a73chmrl.fsf@gnu.org> <831roohlgw.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2qwg673.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9m0g4yw.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="62907"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juanjose.garciaripoll@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 15 17:48:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jOkGn-000GFR-6T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:48:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52010 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOkGm-0002P9-9h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOkFW-0001WT-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:46:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOkFW-0005wT-QQ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:46:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2261 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jOkFW-0006Cz-50; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:46:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:31:40 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247028 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:31:40 +0200 > Cc: juanjose.garciaripoll@gmail.com, Emacs developers > > > Are the values of delay returned by w32_frame_delay similar to what > > you get with libgif animation? > > Sorry, I don't understand. With the native animation w32_frame_delay returns 6. > > 253 status = GdipImageSelectActiveFrame (pBitmap, &pDimensionIDs[0], > (gdb) n > 255 *delay = w32_frame_delay (pBitmap, frame); > (gdb) n > 256 *nframes = frameCount; > (gdb) p *delay > $1 = 6 6 is too much, I think. Are you saying that inside w32_frame_delay, before division by 100, the value is 600? > How do I get the equivalent value when using libgif? Put a breakpoint inside gif_load, here: img->lisp_data = list2 (Qextension_data, img->lisp_data); if (delay) <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< img->lisp_data = Fcons (Qdelay, Fcons (make_float (delay / 100.0), img->lisp_data)); and look at the value.