From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36357: Wrong Ghostscript program name on MS Win Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:32:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83sggvegl9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <90d6e546-8058-1cb3-1d2c-da31f9af0edc@gmail.com> <4291e1bb-c061-39bc-818a-7243544ec52b@gmail.com> <86y2qpj2nv.fsf@gnu.org> <86d0817zdd.fsf@gnu.org> <3f0dcce2-8837-4ef9-8981-3aa5864ca15f@beta.fastmail.com> <868sip7yyi.fsf@gnu.org> <86sggwwpjw.fsf@gnu.org> <87368vevqj.fsf@gnu.org> <831roffxc0.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9lrsj3i.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="126652"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arash@gnu.org, mrsebastianurban@gmail.com, 36357@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 22 16:34:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jRGS3-000WsD-PH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:34:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51926 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRGS2-0003Dw-Ru for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRGRu-0003Bs-JC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRGRu-00018w-7B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41283) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRGRt-00015D-Q8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jRGRt-0000Eg-LR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36357 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36357-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36357.1587565986834 (code B ref 36357); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36357) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2020 14:33:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52829 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jRGQz-0000DN-LL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60568) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jRGQy-0000Ct-NZ for 36357@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRGQt-0004Ze-Bm; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:32:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3425 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jRGQn-0004WX-7O; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:32:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v9lrsj3i.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Tassilo Horn on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:14:41 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:178795 Archived-At: > From: Tassilo Horn > Cc: arash@gnu.org, mrsebastianurban@gmail.com, 36357@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:14:41 +0200 > > > It is IME wrong and user-unfriendly to refuse to load foo.bat or > > foo.cmd and insist on running foo.exe. The reason is that having a > > batch file that shadows a .exe program is the easiest way of > > "customizing" programs, like adding default arguments, setting up a > > special PATH value, etc. > > I agree, and I will omit the extension at least for gs{64,32}winc. The > question is more how likely it is that some user has her own "rungs" > command/batch script which has nothing to do with "running GhostScript" > and then we call it in doc-view. I mean, "rungs" is at least an English > word... I think it's unlikely. E.g., on my system there's not a single file that goes by the name "rungs" with any extension. Another data point is that package authors generally try to choose names for their programs that don't clash with existing popular programs. So I think you could stop worrying about this.