From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41473: Not saving all user options Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:23:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83sgeg3lru.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a70oubi0.fsf@warpmail.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="90557"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: npostavs@gmail.com, 41473@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Philip K." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 27 11:24:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jp74F-000NUO-Np for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:24:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56858 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jp74E-0003l3-AC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jp746-0003kj-LU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jp746-0006St-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jp746-0000UZ-5Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41473 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41473-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41473.15932498201860 (code B ref 41473); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41473) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2020 09:23:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43477 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jp73k-0000Tw-79 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:23:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56872) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jp73h-0000Tg-R9 for 41473@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:23:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jp73c-0006Ld-GN; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:23:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1972 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jp73b-0008Jn-Vw; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 05:23:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a70oubi0.fsf@warpmail.net> (philip@warpmail.net) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182434 Archived-At: > From: "Philip K." > Cc: npostavs@gmail.com, 41473-done@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 11:03:03 +0200 > > > If the issue is to disable saving a customized variable, then we > > already have the 'saved-value' property (and possibly other properties > > that have special meaning for custom.el) which can be manipulated to > > avoid the saving. > > Ah, I didn't know that the property could inhibit saving! I've tried it > out, and it works as advertised. In that case the patch of course isn't > necessary. Sorry for the spam. No apologies are necessary. I'm glad I could help you resolve the issue.