From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 26.1: calc-mode header line [PATCH] Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 17:17:26 +0300 Message-ID: <83sgbvng5l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200831184445.jy4yyfqf3gr5llmk@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83tuwcpv79.fsf@gnu.org> <20200906023516.qreesq6u3mjzwzna@E15-2016.optimum.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12826"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 06 16:18:02 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kEvUY-0003DV-9x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 16:18:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33646 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEvUX-0004Lz-Ch for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 10:18:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEvU4-0003nN-4w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 10:17:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEvU3-0000jC-SD; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 10:17:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1948 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kEvU3-0007wY-6L; Sun, 06 Sep 2020 10:17:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200906023516.qreesq6u3mjzwzna@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Sat, 5 Sep 2020 22:35:16 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254559 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 22:35:16 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Can we please make this change backward-compatible, i.e. have a way > > for users to get the previous behavior by setting calc-show-banner to > > the nil value? > > OK, if you're certain that the current/prior behavior isn't itself a > bug, in that the user asks calc-show-banner to be nil but gets a banner > anyway. Yes, please. > > Or maybe make your changes conditioned by a new value of > > calc-show-banner, different from nil and t? Or maybe it's better to > > introduce a new option? > > No need to clutter up with more options for something this trivial. If > your judgment is that the current behavior isn't a bug, let me know and > I'll just adjust the calc-show-banner-nil case to keep the current/prior > behavior. I don't have an opinion on this matter, I mentioned the possibility of a new option only as an idea worth considering. > > In any case, there should be a NEWS item about the new behavior. > > Slow news day? Diff against this URL? > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/plain/etc/NEWS Yes, thanks.