From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43269: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] provide a user feedback on Emacs being native compiled Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 22:02:41 +0300 Message-ID: <83sgbqkc32.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wo15msrj.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuw9mmfe.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgbtm2d3.fsf@gnu.org> <062E9DA2-B039-4AAD-802B-7333971F5B73@gnu.org> <83ft7smjcd.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7s7kpfr.fsf@gnu.org> <83wo13j5i1.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuw6kgyd.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15563"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, arthur.miller@live.com, 43269@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 09 21:03:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kG5NE-0003uS-QP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 21:03:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG5ND-0004Sb-JI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33486) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG5N0-0004Ch-EC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG5N0-0001qO-4H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG5N0-0005Nj-1W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 19:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43269 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43269-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43269.159967817720677 (code B ref 43269); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 19:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43269) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2020 19:02:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34712 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG5Mr-0005NO-O3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:02:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG5Mp-0005NA-DI for 43269@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:02:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kG5Mj-0001pF-E1; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2809 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kG5Mc-0000Wj-Ah; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:02:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:15:51 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187693 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: rms@gnu.org, arthur.miller@live.com, 43269@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:15:51 +0000 > > > So what do you have there, an i9 CPU? In any case, 4 min with -j16 is > > quite a lot. > > It's Xeon from three yeas ago (8 real cores). It's 4 mins because our > build is not very parallel. > > But that said I think what matters it the total CPU time (here ~30min) > to be compared against the same for the vanilla build (~12min). This is > about what one would get at -j1. No, what matters to users is the elapsed time. And that cannot be simply estimated as the total CPU time. Anyway, thanks for the data (and all your hard work on this).