From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41860: 27.0.91; Can't use `tabulated-list-(narrow|widen)-current-column' on last column Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:34:29 +0300 Message-ID: <83sgaap9my.fsf@gnu.org> References: > <83bllk2z9h.fsf@gnu.org>> <17ec9057-be16-42c6-9c26-8a1e8002c52b@default> <2bcb44e9-201c-4fc9-b31c-c96a695d6c94@default> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12176"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 41860@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 16:38:38 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWJ4-00035W-6t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:38:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57368 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWJ3-0007YM-8N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:38:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWFa-0003gg-Dj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:35:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWFa-0005uK-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWFa-0007hW-2b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41860 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41860-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41860.160311806929535 (code B ref 41860); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41860) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2020 14:34:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41994 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWF3-0007gJ-2s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:34:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWF2-0007g1-Bb for 41860@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:34:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWEw-0005qU-Jp; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:34:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4718 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWEv-0006Lg-Up; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:34:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2bcb44e9-201c-4fc9-b31c-c96a695d6c94@default> (message from Drew Adams on Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:45:17 -0700 (PDT)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:190989 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 20:45:17 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 41860@debbugs.gnu.org > > > May I ask why you feel that this would be a useful feature? I have a > > hard time understanding it since it's not something I can see myself > > wanting to do. > > Turn it around. Is there some reason we would _want_ > to design the right column so it behaves differently > from other columns? No, please DON'T turn it around: we should not introduce features whose main justification is "why not?"