From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44932: 28.0.50; MINIBUF 'nomini' for window-in-direction Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 05:24:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg8qi4yy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r1odtdtx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <342c23a3-e379-452c-6c5e-29dab7592c28@gmx.at> <87h7p8zeim.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5dbd99a5-a51e-318f-0c9d-81dae921af96@gmx.at> <87eekaa8au.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <27c3eec9-5675-47ae-937e-b5440becf6b6@default> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7638"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44932@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 01 04:25:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjwHu-0001qv-FH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:25:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55166 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjwHt-0000qE-39 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:25:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjwHm-0000q6-9a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjwHm-0000qG-26 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjwHl-0001Zv-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:25:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44932 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 44932-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44932.16067930596014 (code B ref 44932); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44932) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2020 03:24:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57368 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjwH4-0001Yw-SP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:24:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55250) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjwH3-0001Yk-Bw for 44932@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:24:17 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjwGx-0000kR-Aq; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:24:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4007 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kjwGw-0001ko-RG; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:24:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <27c3eec9-5675-47ae-937e-b5440becf6b6@default> (message from Drew Adams on Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:09:07 -0800 (PST)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194701 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:09:07 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 44932@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I don't know why MINI-WINDOW would be better than MINIBUF. > > Is this distinction significant here? > > IMHO, MINI-WINDOW would be worse. It's not > about a small window. "Mini-window" is accepted terminology in Emacs, it is used, e.g., in resize-mini-windows. So there's nothing wrong with using that. (And yes, usually that window _is_ small.)