From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45012: 27.1.50; Emacs 27.1 release archive missing emacs-module.h Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 20:53:11 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg8of3ag.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83v9dkf594.fsf@gnu.org> <83tut4f46r.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21968"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45012@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 02 19:54:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXGa-0005bJ-RP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 19:54:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38582 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXGZ-0008BA-Tw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:54:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXGM-00089p-0e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXGL-0003rS-P2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:54:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXGL-0006l7-O1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:54:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45012 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45012-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45012.160693520125931 (code B ref 45012); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45012) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2020 18:53:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37406 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXFh-0006kB-1j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:53:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37658) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXFf-0006jw-5f for 45012@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:53:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55557) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXFZ-0003lE-Ot; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:53:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2700 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kkXFY-0004Eb-Tj; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:53:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Philipp Stephani on Wed, 2 Dec 2020 19:47:49 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194830 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 19:47:49 +0100 > Cc: 45012@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Why is it a problem that emacs-module.h is built as part of Emacs? > > How is that related? I'm making a step back and asking why you thought it was a problem that emacs-module.h was not part of the release tarball. It gets built as part of Emacs, so once Emacs is built, the header is available. So why do you want it to be in the tarball?