From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:05:59 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30733"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, kevin.legouguec@gmail.com To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 04 16:14:58 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gLS-0007p2-Bv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 16:14:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53352 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gLR-0000Ad-Ds for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:14:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gDJ-0007g6-Sn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:06:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38433) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gDI-000491-Su; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:06:32 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2109 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l7gCk-0007zE-8P; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:05:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> (message from Ergus on Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:00:33 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263875 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:00:33 +0100 > From: Ergus > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, > drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >I guess there is nothing to make a final decision about unless someone > >threatens with a patch. Please do that more. :-) > > Could we revert the previous one then?? That's the first part of my > question. I'd prefer to find a binding to which people could agree, because that would leave fewer people unhappy. The two candidates proposed till now are "C-x G" and "C-x M-u".