From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cleaning out old X11 toolkits? Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 22:13:58 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg61doxl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <07D5E64D-DAD0-45B3-B272-627A73D7CBAE@gmail.com> <7308DB2C-27A5-4227-A1F9-9949EE558052@gmail.com> <87sg6alweo.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn1erewq.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnvlecrw.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg69o3av.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwhctte.fsf@gnus.org> <459A0475-E3E7-4159-82DF-93809CCF1E24@gmail.com> <87eehng52n.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtwbye5b.fsf@gmail.com> <87czx7ycva.fsf@tcd.ie> <87eehmyalr.fsf@gmail.com> <877dneoewi.fsf@tcd.ie> <875z2yy6z7.fsf@gmail.com> <1c0598ce-c364-1711-8280-18e4ae091fb6@yandex.ru> <2fd8df6a-1993-fc1e-6e65-12938b0f57b3@gmx.at> <83y2ftdtkr.fsf@gnu.org> <5bde0ea3-8921-e17c-2390-243233ef2a34@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6805"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, rpluim@gmail.com, alan@idiocy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, contovob@tcd.ie, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, dgutov@yandex.ru, yandros@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 21:14:50 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAeq1-0001cn-Sc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:14:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38058 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAeq0-0002no-VY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57444) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAepL-0002MC-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:14:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59588) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAepJ-0002ip-FH; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:14:05 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2388 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lAepI-0008AB-Hn; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:14:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5bde0ea3-8921-e17c-2390-243233ef2a34@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:09:20 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264555 Archived-At: > Cc: casouri@gmail.com, rpluim@gmail.com, alan@idiocy.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org, contovob@tcd.ie, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > dgutov@yandex.ru, yandros@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org > From: martin rudalics > Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:09:20 +0100 > > > Why is that important? Wrapping menu bar is generally a sign of a > > misconfigured frame. > > Maybe it is. But then why do we wrap our tool and tab bars? Because it's a natural behavior of the Emacs display engine, I guess. But my question actually meant to say why the fact that Motif can wrap the menu is important enough to keep its support, if no one uses it?