From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47120: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Stale *.eln files are not recompiled Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:31:20 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg4yhk2v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a6r7jxi9.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnuahlvs.fsf@gnu.org> <83tupehkr9.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12344"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47120@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 21:32:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAvi-00036c-F2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:32:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59872 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAvh-0001be-0d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAva-0001aK-B8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAva-0000T1-3p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAva-0007QA-1H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47120 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47120-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47120.161566749128486 (code B ref 47120); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47120) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2021 20:31:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAv4-0007PO-Tp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:31:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44802) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAv3-0007PC-M7 for 47120@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:31:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAuw-0000CH-U1; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:31:24 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2515 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAup-0007tz-L2; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:31:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:26:39 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202304 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: 47120@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:26:39 +0000 > > > Or maybe we should by default native-compile all the *.el files in the > > tarball as part of the build, and then what I expect will happen > > automatically. > > Yeah, I guess if we go for distributing a tarball with .eln files would > be nice to compile as mush as possible to save computation time to the > user. That said I like the general idea of keeping the behavior of > following builds symmetric with the initial one. OK, then feel free to close this issue.