From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50268: 28.0.50; Assertion warning during native compilation Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:38:27 +0300 Message-ID: <83sfxvvlss.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mto529jd.fsf@gnus.org> <9CF7F0E1-3C92-4F79-B3F3-E51E0E2D43C3@acm.org> <85h7edn9dn.fsf@gmail.com> <83bl4lyfv8.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgs5w4gm.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18113"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, larsi@gnus.org, npostavs@gmail.com, 50268@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 23 08:39:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTIOK-0004U3-24 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:39:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43568 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTIOI-0001LU-Dl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:39:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTINq-0001LI-3J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTINp-0000AM-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTINp-0007kM-MJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:39:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50268 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50268-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50268.163237912229750 (code B ref 50268); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50268) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2021 06:38:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52502 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTINW-0007jl-30 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:38:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51702) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTINR-0007jR-P1 for 50268@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:38:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTINK-0008Al-LM; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:38:30 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2374 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTINK-0004i2-56; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:38:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:46:24 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215165 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: mattiase@acm.org, larsi@gnus.org, npostavs@gmail.com, > 50268@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:46:24 -0400 > > > Which basically means we should revert Noam's commit of yore, is that > > right? > > Not all of it, no. Only the part which makes (&rest) acceptable. That's what I meant, sorry for not being clear enough.