From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestions for improvements to the *Completions* buffer Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:27:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83sfukygcg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pmpurtl9.fsf@posteo.net> <86fsqpsspn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87fsqomyog.fsf@posteo.net> <86fsqoh7w5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87mtkwkuzj.fsf@posteo.net> <86y24d7pdz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87v8zh63uy.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13103"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 22 13:29:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n00kS-0003DX-7h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:29:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60902 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n00kR-0004NQ-3O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:29:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n00ia-0003cw-Nx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:27:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=35472 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n00ia-0004Co-9k; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:27:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=sXsz1WRPNVJMWa9Ut6hFoc+3gckH14xd9CqXMlnPPLE=; b=lqAqUJg7I4vB 1YiudA8aGvP8k9SPzB9NqUzdCJfFrRmbQLnVVzgFI2oaFdpE7fkbwrs/hvXWz9uIOnjoocnVC2JYQ bXOAw1GNagfSbsrF3Wi1/mairPu7o8bC29f79LUtBRV3lT6w8KhSODHW4YLfNRvC39yMD76e5y8/C HmYVEu5bE4fH2ak9p+0k2KTE8k56TL35fl5zVsZu8+er1rcEKfAaE+yyQ350cjgfYC/SSBoJNcfnV MfYBKVJQ8mTiYn/4mlOriOaYMRQxeSI3y0oFOEqvUgNnh7/0NwKDEd98YFLDeK5Vok/r2cLx11l7f ykr4Z1o8697XF4L0Aach9Q==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4153 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n00ia-00053n-70; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:27:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87v8zh63uy.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:32:37 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282715 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:32:37 +0000 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Juri Linkov writes: > > >> I guess this also raises the question of whether or not > >> completion-wrap-movement and completion-auto-select should be set to > >> non-nil by default or not? If applied, maybe they could be enabled > >> for a month or so, to gather experiences and then decide how to > >> continue on that basis. > > > > I agree it's a good idea to enable them both now, and hear any feedback > > for a month. > > Done. > > I'll be awaiting the angry mob. Here it comes...