From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Stylistic changes to tree-sitter code
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 09:54:57 +0300
Message-ID: <83sfj7i0fy.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87h6zp75nt.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87h6zp75nt.fsf@yahoo.com>
 <87h6zptloj.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1t06apv.fsf@yahoo.com>
 <87k04ksa4f.fsf@gmail.com> <87k04k5stm.fsf@yahoo.com>
 <875yg34aas.fsf@yahoo.com> <0E4C5439-B28D-420A-9E4A-BA059269AD57@gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="5288"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 29 09:11:29 2022
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1oog08-0001Ep-Pj
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 09:11:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1oofyt-0005Ip-7W; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 03:10:11 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1oofkC-0006IO-Lt
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 02:55:00 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1oofkC-0005Em-94; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 02:55:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=zQYa7T4wijFXAcg/dTfXT7AAsrtuqnYFR8dWG8PDFt4=; b=GUFghoYikPLI
 Ut+SbJGkgfPyjmNkhnKEAjsuhL2im3FggP56lim2a4TkxVxpQ5KES3dUr6ku3JMg5KhKHnQ/kZMr8
 ZDRYPO58x0C9pfrzyGigz3VheDZfmMGL+lbyIcWD9oPG8pjVuV+Ul19UlCWP0wMYwak+NSEJWTYse
 4225UvoNu06EDcLg1OfLat+MgfrGGDu3cGBM+CMKfv6zjJ4Z/KlFERBUmV1YJHqMe+KqpbojVpMXz
 4l+h4AyQj40mPQyaOAjul40qkn0smapjabK5KA2JHVDk/fUhYG519POzZp8PBJDRCi1pqY3RoSBLh
 hBPtrDF88AQOTlU+Y0cWZw==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1oofkB-0005ze-HA; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 02:54:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <0E4C5439-B28D-420A-9E4A-BA059269AD57@gmail.com> (message from
 Yuan Fu on Fri, 28 Oct 2022 21:19:19 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298727
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/298727>

> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 21:19:19 -0700
> Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>,
>  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> Also, out of curiosity, I thought active voice is good and passive voice is bad?

Yes.  So these particular changes are for the worse, IMO.