From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: EMBA failing again
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 18:13:43 +0200
Message-ID: <83sfhzgkzs.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87r0xjs1jc.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87r0xjs1jc.fsf@yahoo.com>
 <871qpjrvfe.fsf@gmx.de>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="18683"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 01 17:14:54 2022
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1p0mD8-0004i1-Aw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 17:14:54 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1p0mCY-0006Lk-42; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:14:18 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1p0mCV-0006L1-Hy
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:14:15 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1p0mCV-0002os-3O; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:14:15 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=pRrqDXFVZcbdl5PMxfsbv2iV4Oeau4NPFUnfDjnfSeU=; b=bWCjlW4BL1xn
 CVIIrHBjsHLTo4veqdMqqtgW+B30fVXfdhpFdGA6Bhouh4rve9BSAWXmfsSZcr5xtii0mEv37MYT+
 TB+uG224Fp1+3Tju+UjHrV58QgM2EQ0HkEAyvrioaFDVFaykNY8TPRwbgpqdK8aWmivVCIlSpgAp5
 tZGyP9GbwEJo7qpE7rcs3Tn2vvYBpz7Q+5wlOaSL1n6pE+qbgD4f7l6obR0xlgGsPtGfzkAgwObWy
 HuyVG4MU7BqSv8tQwsTwbdkcUe/tvbzHrUwIEGxxVf6L2xMypx/Df06ScOUjnBIIlpCKNlfY4v+th
 XO2K8JtwDzUXB5lUrF1hlg==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1p0mCP-0003hF-KK; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:14:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <871qpjrvfe.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Thu, 01
 Dec 2022 16:32:53 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300816
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/300816>

> From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 16:32:53 +0100
> 
> Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > I haven't seen EMBA pass a commit with 5 icons under the "Stages" column
> > since the Emacs 29 branch was cut.
> >
> > Could the cut somehow have broken EMBA again?
> 
> "5 icons under the "Stages" column" are the scheduled jobs which run 3
> times a day. This is activated for branch "master" only. See
> <https://emba.gnu.org/emacs/emacs/-/pipeline_schedules>.
> 
> Shall we activate it also for the "emacs-29" branch, at least until it
> is released?

I think it will help, yes.

Thanks.