From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59793: 29.0.60; subr.elc is not compiled correctly Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 20:10:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83sfhwcq9h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lenpne48.fsf@163.com> <83cz90erqg.fsf@gnu.org> <87359wr08z.fsf@disroot.org> <0D6CA055-C9DD-425D-9D0B-03B555227E72@gnu.org> <87v8mspfuo.fsf@disroot.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1083"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: tumashu@163.com, 59793@debbugs.gnu.org To: Akib Azmain Turja Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 03 19:11:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p1Wyq-00005q-EU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 19:11:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1Wye-0001Fe-8M; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1Wyc-0001Et-Og for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1Wyc-0002jy-AX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1Wyb-0005pE-Vp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:11:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 18:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59793 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59793-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59793.167009105822386 (code B ref 59793); Sat, 03 Dec 2022 18:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59793) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2022 18:10:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52573 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1WyP-0005oz-Jk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:10:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1WyN-0005ot-QR for 59793@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:10:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1WyF-0002g1-P6; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:10:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=fGUu2rFdcxwa+VF1v+vN7uTp1wcvl6vE1K/qkpSgqN8=; b=UQdoPETOtJ9b JJ76kgYUwK+Gt5f54OCfd4SEE7HrkpnDt9LdzdJbhl0QePsnWPxhqhIhaiz/sHHVyL9HYJgqud98S Iqo7Yq4NqP1FLvKlEjHpxdJIpv02sdx6ODa+M1XjR75CbaTcBqBwPzkTwx3PZAsLamj7684H5y7ih x6vbRJJyNG2LimmDgf8EOtMm9HR6NUljtiidIzmakHlBMaCoQmfoK66IuMObUIljS8TVwhyeyeVNP eyeD9m7xZ8JzApLZSYUF1q2zQ9/oi5aCj5ZLTn4GjjmIXANCFkOT4/q0Zljo6pz12vVej6aXCUY5P F9zSlxyS/GTl7t0OxtkUcw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1WyF-00065v-7F; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:10:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87v8mspfuo.fsf@disroot.org> (message from Akib Azmain Turja on Sat, 03 Dec 2022 23:16:47 +0600) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:249861 Archived-At: > From: Akib Azmain Turja > Cc: Feng Shu , 59793@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 23:16:47 +0600 > > > Am I missing something, or do you redefine a function and then expect it to work like you never redefined it? > > Unexpected: bug59593-yank just inserts the killed text. > Expected: bug59593-yank intercepts and shows the killed text in echo > area. You have redefined a subr.el function with cl-letf*, so how is what happens as result a bug in Emacs? Does the original subr.el function not do what it's supposed to do, before you replace it? I understand you didn't expect the result of cl-letf*, and were surprised by what you saw, but I don't understand why you expect the Emacs development to do something about your surprise. > > So I'm still confused... > > Is it clear now? (Somehow, I think, no.) See above: I understand what you are saying, but not why this is submitted as a bug to the Emacs development team.