all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Cc: tgbugs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix display-buffer-use-some-window to honor reusable-frames
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 13:12:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83sffuap62.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a37e3600-c40b-e9c6-7893-b3a9a580dfb1@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:46:30 +0100)

> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:46:30 +0100
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
> 
>  > Martin, any comments?
> 
> Sorry but I had no idea what 'display-buffer-use-least-recent-window' is
> and what it is supposed to accomplish.

See bug#45688.  You took part in its discussion.

I'm not sure what are your recommendations regarding the feature
installed as result of that discussion.  Would you mind spelling them
out?

> (1) 'display-buffer-use-least-recent-window' claims to be a buffer
> display action function but IIUC it does not return the window used.
> For example, with emacs -Q do C-x 2, C-x o and evaluate
> 
> (display-buffer
>   (get-buffer-create "*foo*")
>   '((display-buffer-use-least-recent-window display-buffer-at-bottom)))
> 
> You get two windows showing *foo*.  This one is easy to fix.

Yes, easy to fix.

> (2) The current version of 'window-bump-use-time' changes the semantics
> of "least recently used window" without even mentioning that anywhere.
> For example, this code in sql.el
> 
>      (let ((one-win (eq (selected-window)
>                         (get-lru-window))))
> 
> will conclude that there is only one window even if another window
> recently created by 'display-buffer-use-least-recent-window' exists.  I
> have no idea how 'get-mru-window' could be affected.
> 
> This is a grave bug.  'window-bump-use-time' could try
> 
>    struct window *sw = XWINDOW (selected_window);
> 
>    if (w != sw)
>      {
>        w->use_time = ++window_select_count;
>        sw->use_time = ++window_select_count;
>      }
> 
> to make sure that the selected window invariably stays the most recently
> used one but this would require some testing.

Would it work to just temporarily select the window inside
display-buffer-use-least-recent-window, so that its use time is bumped
without any sneaky primitives?  Then we could remove
window-bump-use-time.

> (3) The idea of having one action function bump use times works iff
> 'display-buffer-use-least-recent-window' is the _only_ action function
> called by both user and application.  It breaks as soon as another
> action function kicks in - either because the other action function does
> not call 'get-lru-window' or because that other action function does not
> bump the use time of the window used.  This is impossible to fix with
> the current approach.

I'm okay with not fixing this.  After all, this is a feature that only
those who are interested will be using.  We can document this gotcha
of using it in the doc string.

> A few words about Tom's patch: 'display-buffer-use-some-window' must not
> pop up a new window.  It's doc-string clearly says to "Display BUFFER in
> an existing window."  Please don't ever try to change that.  Also, it
> should not care about 'reusable-frames'.  The latter is about reusing a
> window that already shows BUFFER and other action functions might be
> affected badly if 'display-buffer-use-some-window' tried to handle this
> too.  Finally, 'display-buffer-no-window' has no place in another action
> function.  It is strictly reserved to callers and users.

Thanks.  I hope Tom will amend the patch accordingly.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-28 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-27  5:17 [PATCH] Fix display-buffer-use-some-window to honor reusable-frames Tom Gillespie
2023-01-27  5:25 ` Tom Gillespie
2023-01-27  6:19   ` Tom Gillespie
2023-01-27 13:03     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-01-28 10:46       ` martin rudalics
2023-01-28 11:12         ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-01-28 15:35           ` martin rudalics
2023-01-28 16:02             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-01-29 17:39               ` martin rudalics
2023-01-29 18:41                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-01-29 18:50                   ` Tom Gillespie
2023-01-30 16:43                   ` martin rudalics
2023-01-30 17:38                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-01-30 17:57                       ` martin rudalics
2023-01-30 18:04                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-01-31  8:45                           ` martin rudalics
2023-01-31 14:01                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-01 10:45                               ` martin rudalics
2023-02-01 17:38                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-01 18:33                                   ` martin rudalics
2023-01-28 19:04         ` Tom Gillespie
2023-01-28 20:01           ` Tom Gillespie
2023-01-29 17:39             ` martin rudalics
2023-01-29 19:02               ` Tom Gillespie
2023-01-30 16:44                 ` martin rudalics
2023-01-30 17:43                   ` Tom Gillespie
2023-01-30 17:58                     ` martin rudalics
2023-01-30 19:40                       ` Tom Gillespie
2023-01-30 22:45                         ` Tom Gillespie
2023-01-31  8:46                           ` martin rudalics
2023-01-31 18:38                             ` Tom Gillespie
2023-02-01  9:08                               ` martin rudalics
2023-02-01 17:19                                 ` Tom Gillespie
2023-02-01 18:32                                   ` martin rudalics
2023-02-02 16:39                                     ` martin rudalics
2023-02-02 19:57                                       ` Tom Gillespie
2023-02-03  9:09                                         ` martin rudalics
2023-02-11 15:44                                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-11 18:15                                           ` Tom Gillespie
2023-02-12  9:33                                             ` martin rudalics
2023-02-18 17:46                                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-20  9:03                                                 ` martin rudalics
2023-02-20 11:55                                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-20 18:14                                                     ` martin rudalics
2023-02-21 12:02                                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-01-31  8:46                         ` martin rudalics
2023-01-29 17:48         ` Juri Linkov
2023-01-29 18:48           ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-06 10:01         ` martin rudalics

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83sffuap62.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
    --cc=tgbugs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.