From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-* Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 15:36:44 +0200 Message-ID: <83sff1wzdf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87edqlsx6y.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83y1otx3m4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a619sslp.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16749"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 61624@debbugs.gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 19 14:38:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pTjtM-000480-DF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 14:38:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTjtE-0003uS-Fn; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 08:38:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTjtC-0003uF-K8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 08:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTjtC-0000fa-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 08:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pTjtC-0006qD-68 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 08:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 13:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61624 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 61624-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61624.167681382226201 (code B ref 61624); Sun, 19 Feb 2023 13:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61624) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2023 13:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pTjsD-0006oO-Ix for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 08:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45490) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pTjsB-0006oB-Fp for 61624@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 08:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTjs5-0000Tz-I2; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 08:36:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=csZcn9+Vfp6tnkbeo+WvPE3QVxf923zfqEjMDpmnM/Y=; b=sFTpZxAxZyd1 PP5dMlovDl5mEIAW6uhBubpM6TE6R3yCkwVYoUfFWLumCLdHa0nFweiIByvGsnSJv5tbQUXSGf0Of 8LDmWqakzi3Ut0yHTvqTZj0kIAHw0j6iax7izNXXjhDTtatt4yDHy8Td8TpSzv3yg6k8wKuj+zz7m 98E4qteRDgzRGoYrIsYbOlrfeiVVYtBlDDEN200bXc1WQcokPtvyTyQ6tjCQXAyYS0NYKxsX6I56J R2weD9E4n/3nmi1vOdT0H59tqtg58/v+sxaFyvwJNQ6Ee881nonUrAK/UzY3bGzRVrB4FQDl0vdlD 75NnrfLh177dXXZke2JBHQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTjrr-00062n-5w; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 08:36:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a619sslp.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> (message from Manuel Giraud on Sun, 19 Feb 2023 14:16:34 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256067 Archived-At: > From: Manuel Giraud > Cc: 61624@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 14:16:34 +0100 > > Here is a new version that adresses most of your comments. LGTM, thanks. > >> You can delete images through Image-Dired also. Type @kbd{d} > >> (@code{image-dired-flag-thumb-original-file}) to flag the image file > >> -for deletion in the Dired buffer. You can also delete the thumbnail > >> +for deletion in the Dired buffer. You can also remove the thumbnail > >> image from the thumbnail buffer with @kbd{C-d} > >> (@code{image-dired-delete-char}). > > > > Not sure I understand the reason for this. "Deletion" goes together > > with "delete", so why use "remove" instead? > > You're right that it goes with "delete" from the command name but I > thought that "remove" is better because no file is deleted from this > operation. Only the thumbnail is removed from the thumbnails buffer. Then I suggest to reword: Alternatively, you can remove an image's thumbnail from the thumbnail buffer without flagging the image for deletion, by typing @kbd{C-d}.