From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: server.el test failures Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 20:39:28 +0200 Message-ID: <83sfergdgf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877h40vb8h.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4EA4D31B.4050604@cs.ucla.edu> <4EA5E08D.8070903@cs.ucla.edu> <861qmvcglp.fsf@aarsen.me> <98e880a0-d076-cfd9-b39d-50c84fa8975a@gmail.com> <811d85e0-4032-68df-bc0c-1073ff5d1b96@cs.ucla.edu> <5a38c18d-263c-223b-7335-8395a10eb494@gmail.com> <00864fe6-b63a-685f-2d20-4e1fd5a5573e@cs.ucla.edu> <3e7c26d6-215a-6c29-5304-0e32f42b2174@gmail.com> <87zg8z5afj.fsf@gmail.com> <83ttz7giib.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0ub561t.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9299"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 27 19:40:08 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pWiPu-00029a-F6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 19:40:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWiPE-0000Mg-3g; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 13:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWiPC-0000Kw-Em for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 13:39:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWiPB-0005ZL-F5; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 13:39:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=mcfYppVuLVLWFaJKmEUPogE2UlSiPSwqAOS+zqJ6BiE=; b=erYnREFoyhzywqf/4Bh2 4X39cfFgyBowqL/Z/XGRpO7UAGtH587c9+Eve1bIUDInwQqtM0pakMlzulToLwHz2y+TdoPhQ362z HIxCpHWNA/stMB1F2If+PSguq4PfA31uSXUMhdS1RD7t9Sq077cdfQP4KIc/nqSxxMCn1IwLPYLqI OZpFa4C4l5PtnNRIOmJagpkbZvv4JfVUijhRkFAaVMMjNChxjyYEUKTEiHb0PpmqyFyz7V7fOEK4Y fnrHF9utlOLdBpdp2fHaZSaqW3ooyclrNt5C/cAdJ70r91dkYuadvYCoccIbogj5ZLu4dav6Msq6O AAG4FvVJEFbJrA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWiPA-0007TI-2c; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 13:39:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r0ub561t.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Mon, 27 Feb 2023 19:14:54 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303839 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 19:14:54 +0100 > > Eli> It's probably bogus, or the test is unstable, but just so we don't > Eli> give up easily: can you show a C and Lisp backtrace from the SIGIO > Eli> signal handler when it gets the signal in this case? > > Iʼd love to, but our signal handler never gets called: > > (gdb) b deliver_process_signal > Breakpoint 3 at 0x19d47e: deliver_process_signal. (2 locations) > (gdb) r > Starting program: /home/rpluim/repos/emacs/src/emacs --module-assertions --no-init-file --no-site-file --no-site-lisp -L " > :." \ > -l ert -l lisp/server-tests.el \ > --batch --eval '(ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit (quote (not (or (tag :unstable) ( > tag :nativecomp)))))' > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". > [New Thread 0x7ffff129d700 (LWP 783192)] > Running 1 tests (2023-02-27 18:45:41+0100, selector `(not (or (tag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp)))') > [Detaching after vfork from child process 783193] > [New Thread 0x7ffff0992700 (LWP 783194)] > [New Thread 0x7fffeba46700 (LWP 783195)] > [Thread 0x7fffeba46700 (LWP 783195) exited] > [Thread 0x7ffff129d700 (LWP 783192) exited] > [Thread 0x7ffff22f8040 (LWP 783187) exited] > > Program terminated with signal SIGIO, I/O possible. > The program no longer exists. What does "handle SIGIO" say before you type "run"? Try this: (gdb) handle SIGIO stop print and then run the test in batch mode again.