From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:54:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83sfd2g2ek.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <83mt3d73c2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0sptinq.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyh706c.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya1tdwf.fsf@posteo.net> <83edop6sdy.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkp6o0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn2h5825.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2gkhzr.fsf@posteo.net> <83cz485oxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87leiwdyff.fsf@posteo.net> <834jpk5hih.fsf@gnu.org> <871qkom3fj.fsf@posteo.net> <83mt3b4yfc.fsf@gnu.org> <87edonlsxi.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyf4vzb.fsf@gnu.org> <871qknllkj.fsf@posteo.net> <83fs934pjf.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2fk47y.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9815"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 14 12:55:26 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH5S-0002MD-9Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:55:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH59-0001B7-RP; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH54-0001Ay-Ks for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH54-0000Hi-95 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH53-00026u-Tz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.16814696707907 (code B ref 62720); Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2023 10:54:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45652 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH4X-00023Q-Pq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:54:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54054) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH4T-000235-4s for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:54:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH4K-0000D5-Lo; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:54:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=0jAOqqS9gAI1owhCPYSnpl64dHI04UByzA1/RnKb4JI=; b=KuoPFm7XKXUS +7X8S9fGX9lyLuAWp8/4Y4/i9v84RUtqPll4ci9uN61FHRijC2WkEKqfyH6KxoFKljXyk4cCATvb4 +ieHoBS5hfw+9lRX6oOxTu9z+Pgvfk0RZMbZDhVV4XQKCkJVrzubCKpk/cfmcBX+Qdc51ksHOoOIH E6nWnUAWOPhiCyW/TCGIQIGHNmdNkULInE2X3K1yBnr3qCvhc/n+O0TdwQM0R5YgHuBeErx6S6avl i4fwwWGHg9OiRWc8RjHRbhsDdyBbUIoKoGjAq/e1oD9Uv1wkc8NtSgQtPHtvdVcRSr8r4kU31x4E9 JqaOh9/vfLzMcaXWu19glQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnH4J-0003YL-58; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:54:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wn2fk47y.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Thu, 13 Apr 2023 18:49:05 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259900 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, > larsi@gnus.org > Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 18:49:05 +0000 > > After having added the user option, I am not sure about the prefix > argument. I see this as a temporary fix due to the time constraints of > releasing Emacs 29. It is disabled for now, but can be enabled on > master to see if there are any problems. Yes, we can change the default to t on master. But that would also require to adjust a few doc strings, see below. > But for now, this patch supports both the user option and the prefix > argument. I am still not satisfied with the documentation, but cannot > come up with a better phrase than > > installing potentially newer versions of built-in packages from > package archives > > for explaining the issue without getting too technical. Do you have any > ideas? See below. > +*** New user option 'package-install-upgrade-built-in'. > +When enabled, 'package-install' can be used to install potentially > +newer versions of built-in packages. I suggest When enabled, 'package-install' will include in the list of upgradeable packages those built-in packages (like Eglot, for example) for which a newer version is available on GNU ELPA. By default, this is disabled; however, if 'package-install' is invoked with prefix argument, it will also include built-in packages in the list of packages which could be upgraded. > +(defcustom package-install-upgrade-built-in nil > + "Non-nil means that built-in packages can be upgraded via a package archive. > +If disabled, then `package-install' will not allow installing > +potentially newer versions of built-in packages from package > +archives." The last sentence should be qualified by "...unless invoked with a prefix argument". Thanks.