From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-29 9b775ddc057 1/2: ; * etc/EGLOT-NEWS: Fix wording of last change. Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 14:20:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83sfc7cbnx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <168335548287.8529.4912240840977468283@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <59835735-faa0-4096-e491-35ec92964b7a@gutov.dev> <831qjthhm8.fsf@gnu.org> <715cdac6-83f6-6907-2ff8-3b33381f3487@gutov.dev> <83zg6hg29c.fsf@gnu.org> <83ttwpfvcr.fsf@gnu.org> <83h6spfose.fsf@gnu.org> <35df1362-fd92-9424-97d0-df3479414677@gutov.dev> <83edntfm6e.fsf@gnu.org> <667d5cc1-4a3c-5cd4-21c0-adff89cea769@gutov.dev> <834jopfdwz.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8h4elki.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6sofs02.fsf@posteo.net> <83r0rsebcf.fsf@gnu.org> <875y94f4eo.fsf@posteo.net> <834joodmaw.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7mwgd1x.fsf@posteo.net> <83y1m0c4zq.fsf@gnu.org> <87fs88gc5a.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13303"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 08 13:19:49 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyuD-0003Fr-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 13:19:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvytk-0002Ce-0Y; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:19:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyth-00025q-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:19:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvyth-0002YN-6H; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:19:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=0EfBe/6hxnZhb+KRNhc3LvdfeYXYjYSzwhuFXsyRr84=; b=mx722Tg7O2An xWUVbn4ZOrrAM3Hk6pvK1s3qoHR5IIeeGf4cvp+ARPZGphlpDeY/VcTaTrqHc9xPnkWe2vSz4wguz 98sQtNm3HJNbE43q0Khfk5jVg2law9voo4Oa4mP1mUDW1p43txaUeo+G2dud0eOMbSuBf8hltLy8W HXaU8Dl7DXVTrBA8SMxGyu4798b0plRtp9lxo8Widp2VwnYJVXPtu5IxeckE8CULEXKHe5LAXBID+ MNqCNd8naMp+X6eb0QN7d/skc9IevXlbAKCj1IjH+V0Ue9nhRnZsnl8eSZze5G9ev1Hmm1r8fOjaC wBqCWlRhp0nkt4DeRD7qFQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pvytg-0002sN-Le; Mon, 08 May 2023 07:19:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fs88gc5a.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Sun, 07 May 2023 19:44:01 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305974 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 19:44:01 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Philip Kaludercic > >> Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 19:24:26 +0000 > >> > >> Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> > >> >> but on my system, it immediately suggests upgrading 24 packages, which > >> >> is a lot. > >> > > >> > Can you show the list of those 24 packages? > >> > >> I am on a different system now, so the prompt differs slightly and have > >> other updates, but this is what it looks like: > >> > >> Packages to install: 23 (xref-1.6.3 > >> verilog-mode-2022.12.18.181110314 use-package-2.4.5 tramp-2.6.0.4 > >> svg-1.1 soap-client-3.2.1 so-long-1.1.2 python-0.28 project-0.9.8 > >> org-9.6.5 ntlm-2.1.0 nadvice-0.4 map-3.3.1 let-alist-1.0.6 > >> jsonrpc-1.0.17 flymake-1.3.4 external-completion-0.1 erc-5.5 > >> eldoc-1.14.0 eglot-1.15 cl-lib-0.7.1 cl-generic-0.3 bind-key-2.4.1). > >> Packages to upgrade: 2 (editorconfig-0.9.1 inspector-0.29). > >> Proceed? (y or n) > > > > I see nothing unexpected in this list. And since the feature is > > opt-in, what are the dangers of having it? > > There is no danger, it might just be overwhelming? I was a bit > surprised at first. But if you think it is fine, then I have no > objections. One more question: the patch you proposed affects both "U" and "/ u", right?