From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65512: 30.0.50; Docstring current-idle-time: PSEC? Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 08:28:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83sf86mkxr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pm3bkdhu.fsf@web.de> <83zg2foee4.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1hy9126.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29360"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 65512@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 26 07:29:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qZlrE-0007Rd-3p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 07:29:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZlr0-00059E-IH; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:28:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZlqy-000590-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:28:56 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZlqy-0003n6-LK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:28:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qZlr3-0008K2-Jt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 05:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65512 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65512-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65512.169302770031938 (code B ref 65512); Sat, 26 Aug 2023 05:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65512) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2023 05:28:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41495 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qZlqO-0008J4-33 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qZlqJ-0008In-3E for 65512@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZlq7-0003j9-PM; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:28:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=nXcednThdx8LEDctqy/ThlalnkRvTkBOCiktFgWGOII=; b=InmyO7nvkFhR P2v/422B+EA4nRrsl62VTofcABa4ZwiWBJlKrJBquDq/0+hysVl5dgm3ORIcGTUGNAymwZbvo4z0b SLtE+uWkg4o9DmpkHDRxm/md1UVBm0UzWdw87r15hLJd3AHHwn/vabgutVcsJCRB8faffiJGS2OpX Hp71aSlpf8NQi3b7zCU+/i9jsm03U61QiEvy2Pg2vq9SipZ76po8Jjcn3VP/QuCxEzSFeUbnhW+vY +OjyFpm333ADq6XxtOtQIq2vKSanHUvr7OeaGUJT1n41kaiT3VdFsM6GT2E2QDO0UgRZR9I73xKFx Up1rAL4tim3NxPRqqQPk0w==; In-Reply-To: <87y1hy9126.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:04:01 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:268464 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: 65512@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:04:01 +0200 > > Is there a reason why we mention this detail that's also in the > `current-time' docstring, but not others? With other words: could we > just remove the mention of PSEC? Just wondering. In general, the 4-member list doesn't have to satisfy that condition, and the doc string refers to current-time only for the possible formats of the value, not for anything else. Also, this remark was always in the doc string of current-idle-time, so it's possible it is important to some applications. So IMO we should leave that there.