From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#66394: 29.1; Make register-read-with-preview more useful
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 10:24:19 +0200
Message-ID: <83sf45qjik.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87il7ib6cu.fsf@posteo.net> <87sf50s1gh.fsf@posteo.net>
 <83o7ficesp.fsf@gnu.org> <878r6leh9d.fsf@posteo.net>
 <83il5pbnmh.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfz1cz7s.fsf@posteo.net>
 <83bkbc7j1o.fsf@gnu.org> <8734wov2wv.fsf@posteo.net>
 <83v89j6arv.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyvpf8y6.fsf@posteo.net>
 <83plzp82mb.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5qhxf05.fsf@posteo.net>
 <83jzpkvs4z.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8947ulo.fsf@posteo.net>
 <871qbsk5le.fsf@posteo.net>
 <f7f749d1-3a2d-0ea0-a106-6c586f4faca7@gutov.dev>
 <87v894hr2e.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyvbepi0.fsf@posteo.net>
 <87bkavk9nv.fsf@posteo.net>
 <8eebbb30-9366-e869-a39a-8100638cb99a@gutov.dev>
 <87o7etgxeb.fsf@posteo.net> <jwv4jglb5f9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="25448"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: thievol@posteo.net, dmitry@gutov.dev, stefankangas@gmail.com,
 michael_heerdegen@web.de, 66394@debbugs.gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 14 09:25:00 2023
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1rDh1g-0006Q7-1g
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:25:00 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1rDh1U-0004fe-At; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:24:48 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1rDh1S-0004fU-Gj
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:24:46 -0500
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1rDh1S-0006cb-8T
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:24:46 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rDh1i-0003Sy-Bj
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:25:02 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:25:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.66394.B66394.170254229213305@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66394
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
Original-Received: via spool by 66394-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66394.170254229213305
 (code B ref 66394); Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:25:02 +0000
Original-Received: (at 66394) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2023 08:24:52 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60154 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1rDh1Y-0003SX-BS
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:24:52 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39628)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1rDh1W-0003SL-6l
 for 66394@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:24:51 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1rDh15-00069M-7u; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 03:24:28 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=94x/YlM4qOH2HCaaIOP5he741esunPF6VbYRiJcMm44=; b=bCHSu5qmXl7w
 /KaCPP4nBcOWdqNlWTZkRfwOxblqK9UQUqJY21SkbzIGxNm/yJ7aK2wjmEyuEVyXywdzC0iUXEgSS
 BQdcQr0X5D8dzwkA2ILDsE2JJVUEn7p3+Hy2ZnfYLs90QUaMyvIPjxDzQl8ffUwT1MiBeZ2dzVlS8
 Ee+2sX/27FdwCmk0pywZp5EfTq8ABYUHy5FQ3y1kpOh8ElhGTYRQTbpy0sdpZas0QVnAa+Gk1APSs
 3/9MnHmDnGDZ45eluW2YScXhwNkDJDSVAwi8s1DKM5t2EeYFxHq48e7IMRDr87IRFV8DgLNY9CA+M
 JXOfM/Va45l3NpfvsVAjTQ==;
In-Reply-To: <jwv4jglb5f9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
 Monnier on Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:38:56 -0500)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
 the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:276179
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/276179>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>,  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>   michael_heerdegen@web.de,  66394@debbugs.gnu.org,  stefankangas@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:38:56 -0500
> 
> >> I was actually thinking this might be a good default behavior: no
> >> confirmation in all cases except when overwriting. It's a change from
> >> the current one still, but a smaller one.
> 
> Note that when used within a keyboard macro, it's annoying if it
> sometimes requires confirmation and sometimes not.

Perhaps we could avoid the confirmation request when the command is
run from a macro?