From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep network security info buffers after use Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 14:54:17 +0200 Message-ID: <83sf3n956u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87plz4irev.fsf@red-bean.com> <83frzufo9x.fsf@gnu.org> <838r5jd56w.fsf@gnu.org> <87mstzwr5j.fsf@red-bean.com> <834jg7d0p2.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6k6chhq.fsf@gmail.com> <83frzq9kv9.fsf@gnu.org> <8734vpvxau.fsf@gmail.com> <834jg4aof7.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37756"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 27 13:55:33 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rITRd-0009XS-3m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 13:55:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rITQj-0008NU-3F; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 07:54:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rITQh-0008N2-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 07:54:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rITQg-0000tI-PX; Wed, 27 Dec 2023 07:54:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=qq0TxyvJDc/QZXke0YXfU74cMwUH0NvpEtJe8IfqKRI=; b=JgsALtAIQnY5 +lhZYfI13/DKNA2dkEfhhFVI/j+Av2Py02RCOMzE+g5H0HGYD6ugMe68Lj+ROCX9VbO2peujppInS 2NbMaIQU4w78UNmdPci8pu/u1amfye8P0WJ4iYdHF7zUwFwCxILyU8DYD8IW6uT/gw3Kx1i6nf/0E wC9erP+PzKAT1m5VXkdCXu60/QeYZf8EKpYcOAylKbmZ1Qm4mYU9cHToi51Th+d4Mobe1QCWgOqvy b6RoDQ9NEqLreF3tyfR3FygNTlr/CpMaByZ/QrxbW4CnBiWuGh6Y+D5cMm2rz3GJpLV6/EIv7Gzhi BEkAgjaAPlEB6bnJpUhDdA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 26 Dec 2023 16:09:07 -0600) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314244 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 16:09:07 -0600 > Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > There were two suggestions that I'm okay with: either to have a user > > option to control whether this information is kept (until the next > > connection which needs a certificate confirmation, which will then > > erase the information about the previous certificate), or adding a > > separate command to reproduce these details in a buffer. If someone > > submits a patch along these lines, we could all be at least somewhat > > happier. > > Did you consider a change like this? Yes, it's basically one of the two I described above. It was already proposed here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2023-12/msg00690.html where I also mentioned some of the caveats that will need to be taken care of.