From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-23 release branch Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:53:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83r5nq1vox.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zl2g24xy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83d3zc2iqr.fsf@gnu.org> <87eijsoz6u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <833a073kss.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrxj1o92.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdd220yk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268337256 26029 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2010 19:54:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 11 20:54:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpoSI-0003lS-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:54:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39777 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NpoSE-0002Jm-FN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NpoS8-0002Fk-RB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46246 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NpoS7-0002Dl-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpoS5-000328-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:59694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpoS5-00031l-NX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:49 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KZ400J00V48DT00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:53:47 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.214.230]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KZ400F1NV9LUWB0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:53:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121830 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:04:54 -0500 > > > (Not that you should expect the merge today or tomorrow, even if > > everybody agrees.) > > Right, so unless this is expected to be "real soon now", you might want > to publish your branch in `emacs-bidi'. Is that even possible? `emacs-bidi' was branched from pre-22.1 Emacs, while my development branch was branched from Emacs 23.1. Wouldn't merging them create some very messy history DAG?