From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr vs. git repository Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:36:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83r5cwq2jb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20110101.092838.211465745.wl@gnu.org> <83zkrlosry.fsf@gnu.org> <878vz5hqwd.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293881655 4928 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2011 11:34:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 11:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 12:34:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYzis-0000PS-M7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:34:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34417 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYzir-0005XU-Jp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:34:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50373 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYzim-0005XL-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:34:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYzil-0007Ju-Ox for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:34:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:45072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYzik-0007JA-7t; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LEC00H00CCCU600@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:33:59 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.219.104]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LEC00HCVDGM4MB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:33:59 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <878vz5hqwd.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134104 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:14:42 +0100 > > > (A great surprise was "annotate", which, for xdisp.c, took 1 > > minute with bzr, but a whopping 4.5 minutes with git. But I see > > that as a curiosity.) > > That is not a curiosity but a consequence of git's design choices. Yes, I understand that (and thanks for the details). I meant "curiosity" as in "not really representative for comparison purposes". Sorry for unfortunate choice of words.