From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109864: Fix minor problems found by static checking.
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 23:44:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83r4qieszx.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504506E8.5070506@cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:37:12 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> On 09/03/2012 08:35 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > What problems did static checking find in this (and other similar)
> > fragment?
>
> It didn't find any problems in those two cases, as near as I can
> tell; it was a false alarm by the new GCC flag -Wjump-misses-init.
Thanks for the explanation.
> Since those fragments annoy
GCC false alarms aside, are there any reasons to prefer separate
declaration and initialization?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-03 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.503691.1346667442.854.emacs-diffs@gnu.org>
2012-09-03 15:35 ` [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109864: Fix minor problems found by static checking Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-03 18:54 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-09-03 19:37 ` Paul Eggert
2012-09-03 20:44 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2012-09-03 22:29 ` Paul Eggert
2012-09-04 3:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-09-04 5:29 ` Jan Djärv
2012-09-04 5:45 ` Paul Eggert
2012-09-04 8:31 ` Jan Djärv
2012-09-04 8:58 ` Paul Eggert
2012-09-04 10:25 ` Jan Djärv
2012-09-04 14:29 ` Jason Rumney
2012-09-04 19:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-09-04 18:51 ` Wojciech Meyer
2012-09-04 18:22 ` Wojciech Meyer
2012-09-04 14:26 ` Jason Rumney
2012-09-04 14:33 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-09-04 16:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-04 18:36 ` Wojciech Meyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83r4qieszx.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.