From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12515: 24.2.50; Error during redisplay: (eval (mode-line-eol-desc)) signaled (quit) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:37:41 +0200 Message-ID: <83r4pphm96.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sja5hn5c.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348605487 29984 80.91.229.3 (25 Sep 2012 20:38:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12515@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 25 22:38:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbtS-0008CB-K4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:38:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42243 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbtN-0003u1-Lh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50721) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbtL-0003tk-1A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbtJ-0002j3-Vw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46281) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbtJ-0002iz-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:38:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbvG-0008Dh-Dz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12515 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12515-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12515.134860559731578 (code B ref 12515); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12515) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Sep 2012 20:39:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbvA-0008DG-FE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:39:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:40215) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGbv1-0008Cz-TB for 12515@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:39:52 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MAX00900ACY4N00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 12515@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:37:45 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MAX0087FAMWZQ80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:37:45 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64887 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <12515@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:22:40 -0700 > > > Do you remember what were you doing when this happened? Is it > > possible you typed "C-g"? > > No. But yes, it is possible that I hit `C-g'. Unless you see a lot of these messages in *Messages*, I wouldn't worry about this. What happens is that as part of redisplay of the mode line, the display engine calls the function mode-line-eol-desc (defined on bindings.el), which produces the end-of-line (EOL) indicator near the left edge of the mode line. Because signaling an error normally re-enters redisplay (to display the error message), the display code suppresses the normal way of processing signals from Lisp it calls, and instead intercepts all signals and adds this kind of message to *Messages*. Since mode-line-eol-desc does not disable quitting (maybe it should), hitting C-g when it runs could cause this signal, I think.