From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: What are advantages and disadvantages of RMAIL and mh-rmail ? Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 23:42:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83r4c8el09.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5ili3zuuj0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8761tr9ofa.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <87ob7iq5sf.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <87hada9h6z.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <87r4c9yenn.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <874n9563da.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <87had5604d.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <874n95xqwh.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <87siwpl1x2.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <87eh89kwga.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <878uygrfln.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <87fvsopxld.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380400958 14030 80.91.229.3 (28 Sep 2013 20:42:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 20:42:38 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 28 22:42:40 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VQ1Lc-0007Ee-65 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 22:42:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42556 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQ1Lb-0007bm-RA for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:42:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53153) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQ1LN-0007bd-VW for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQ1LI-0007Ox-Ro for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:42:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:36208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQ1LI-0007Oq-Jq for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:42:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MTU00400RZHYD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 23:42:19 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MTU004GAS6IMHB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 23:42:19 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87fvsopxld.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:93732 Archived-At: > From: Emanuel Berg > Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 21:14:29 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Yes, you did blow up. As you usually do with anyone > > who dares to disagree. > > Wrong. Disagree is fine. I said so first thing. That > wasn't the point. You take shots at me for no reason > (and incorrectly so), and then you pull rank. I gave you > a shot to reconsider by clarifying what I meant. But you > didn't. This isn't some game where you set the rules. If I have to say something I consider important, I will, whether you like it or not. So will others. Learn to live with that. > > I do care when you misrepresent packages you don't > > like > > Is there some other user here who can support you in your claim I need no support for that, we are not in court or in parliament. I described my setup. It is based on existing features. Others will read that and make up their own minds. They can like it or not, it's their decision. Let them do that, as I do, and stop arguing as if every disagreement with you is "taking shots" at you. That is just silly and childish. > If anyone would like to express support (without > arguments, as this discussion is over for my part) for > Eli's behaviour, I urge you to do so now, I'll put you > in my KILL file as well and be done with it. How typical.