bug#16007: admin/charsets/mule-charsets.el requires old Emacs version

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

Ping!

Is the patch suggested below correct, please?

> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:16:36 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: 16007@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > From: handa@gnu.org (K. Handa)
> > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 16007@debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:30:35 +0900
> > 
> > Does your change break mule-charsets.el working with Emacs
> > 22?  If not, it's ok to keep it as is now, but if it breaks,
> > please revert your change.
> 
> It is unusual to keep code in Emacs that specifically targets older
> versions.  So no, I didn't keep the v22 code.  But I could easily
> reinstate it, if that's a requirement, conditioned by the Emacs
> version.
> 
> > > What about the problem with indian-is13194 in list-charset-chars --
> > > what is needed to fix that one?
> > 
> > I'm sorry that I don't have a time to fix it yet.
> 
> I think I know the reason: we didn't specify the mapping file for that
> charset, and didn't make that charset unified.  Do you agree with the
> following patch?  It makes list-charset-chars work again for this
> charset.
> 
> --- lisp/international/mule-conf.el~	2013-06-30 07:20:59.000000000 +0300
> +++ lisp/international/mule-conf.el	2013-12-11 16:13:53.778785000 +0200
> @@ -895,7 +895,8 @@
>    :emacs-mule-id 225
>    :supplementary-p t
>    :code-space [33 126]
> -  :code-offset #x180000)
> +  :code-offset #x180000
> +  :unify-map "MULE-is13194")
>  
>  (let ((code-offset #x180100))
>    (dolist (script '(devanagari sanskrit bengali tamil telugu assamese
> @@ -1197,6 +1198,7 @@
>  (unify-charset 'japanese-jisx0212)
>  (unify-charset 'japanese-jisx0213-1)
>  (unify-charset 'japanese-jisx0213-2)
> +(unify-charset 'indian-is13194)
>  
>  \f
>  ;; These are tables for translating characters on decoding and
> 
> 
> 
>