From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16433: 24.3.50; find_newline screws up in Rmail buffers Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:31:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83r48b62ut.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389645134 19497 80.91.229.3 (13 Jan 2014 20:32:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16433@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 13 21:32:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W2oBH-0001LY-2F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:32:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44896 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2oBG-0003Jt-Kd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:32:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2oB6-0003F1-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:32:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2oB0-00072U-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W2oB0-00072Q-GO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W2oB0-0000YT-1L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16433 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16433-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16433.13896450872078 (code B ref 16433); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16433) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2014 20:31:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49414 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W2oAQ-0000XQ-5R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:31:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:46244) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W2oAN-0000X9-6g for 16433@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:31:24 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MZC00H00WE9GR00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 16433@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:31:21 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MZC00HC4X04D360@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:31:16 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83423 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:37:11 -0500 > From: Richard Stallman > > > mail-fetch-field gave the wrong result for the X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES > field, perhaps because it happened to be last. It included the > newline after that field in the return value, which is wrong. > Setting cache-long-scans to nil in the Rmail buffer made the > bug go away, so I think the problem is in the newline cache. I agree. > I think it would be better to fix the underlying bug, rather than turn > off the cache in Rmail mode. Again, I agree. > I suspect that the cache does not handle Rmail's changes in > narrowing. No, I don't think so. I suspect it has something to do with buffer-swap-text. Is it possible to have a reproducible recipe for this problem?