From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16878: 24.3.50; gif animation continues even after killing buffer Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:31:58 +0200 Message-ID: <83r46ryu7l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87txbnfj4l.fsf@tao.kanis.fr> <83y50zywqp.fsf@gnu.org> <8738j7f7g3.fsf@tao.kanis.fr> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393349715 17775 80.91.229.3 (25 Feb 2014 17:35:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16878@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ivan Kanis Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 25 18:35:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WILub-00047f-Tj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:35:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36292 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WILub-0007Mm-IX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:35:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WILsS-0004Rp-1X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:33:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WILsM-00089k-TX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:33:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WILsM-00089e-RM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WILsM-0006Gu-8r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16878 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16878-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16878.139334953724008 (code B ref 16878); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16878) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2014 17:32:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39684 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WILrc-0006F9-Lo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:32:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:60208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WILrX-0006Em-Fm for 16878@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:32:14 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1K00F00B699V00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 16878@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:30:10 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1K00B50BAAPD40@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:30:10 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <8738j7f7g3.fsf@tao.kanis.fr> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86194 Archived-At: > From: Ivan Kanis > Cc: 16878@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:06:20 +0100 > > Lisp Backtrace: > "image-metadata" (0xbfffd4e8) > "image-multi-frame-p" (0xbfffd7e8) > "image-animate-timeout" (0xbfffdb04) > "apply" (0xbfffdc08) > "byte-code" (0xbfffdee0) > "timer-event-handler" (0xbfffe2d0) Thanks. So now the question becomes: which timer is that whose handler is being run?