From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17554: 24.3.91; [Regression] re-usage of dired *Marked Files* buffer window Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 10:31:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83r43lkl30.fsf@gnu.org> References: <22309.78500.835208.21374@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <831tvlm4f2.fsf@gnu.org> <537EF7D2.1080303@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400830347 11681 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2014 07:32:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 07:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17554@debbugs.gnu.org, winkler@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 23 09:32:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjxh-0004rG-3M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 09:32:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41465 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjxg-0005Eg-Jg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:32:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnjxZ-0005EZ-1l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:32:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnjxT-000335-Dt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:32:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58341) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnjxT-000331-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WnjxS-0007yk-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 07:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17554 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17554-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17554.140083027830592 (code B ref 17554); Fri, 23 May 2014 07:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17554) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2014 07:31:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjwg-0007xD-7D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:31:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:55339) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnjwa-0007wT-4F for 17554@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 03:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6000500MR59C00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 17554@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 10:31:00 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N60005SHNJN5I60@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 23 May 2014 10:31:00 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <537EF7D2.1080303@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89387 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 09:25:06 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: 17554@debbugs.gnu.org > > We should try to improve the default behavior. The points Roland made > are valid, unfortunately. I didn't say there weren't, I'm just saying it's not a regression.