From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18357: 24.3.93; Calendar not fully displayed Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:09:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83r3zygjbd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874mwv40ja.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <83vbpaguyl.fsf@gnu.org> <87a96mqkl3.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <5401C6E7.9070000@gmx.at> <5401C837.9090704@gmx.at> <83sikegla7.fsf@gnu.org> <5401D6F6.6010109@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409407884 2005 80.91.229.3 (30 Aug 2014 14:11:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18357@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 30 16:11:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XNjN5-0006cd-Tf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 16:11:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46652 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNjN5-0006Zd-C3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:11:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNjMx-0006ZM-IM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNjMs-0001TA-9S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:11:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNjMs-0001T6-63 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNjMr-0003UN-SN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18357 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18357-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18357.140940780613336 (code B ref 18357); Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18357) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2014 14:10:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54514 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNjLx-0003Sz-Ul for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:56316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNjLu-0003SO-26 for 18357@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NB400600GWCZ100@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 18357@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:08:06 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NB4007L5HXHZW20@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:08:06 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5401D6F6.6010109@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92860 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:51:50 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: 18357@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net > > > I see no differences between the 2 progn forms you evaluated, so I > > cannot really judge whether they correspond to what Stephen reported. > > You mean the `sit-for' doesn't make a difference for you? I suppose we > have to do a redisplay to know the mode-line height when fitting the > window in `calendar' but maybe you have a better explanation for this. The original report was about mode-line face causing the problem. Are you saying that the problem is not the face, but the lack of sit-for somewhere?