From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:33:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83r3sny6yz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5505E34C.4000106@dancol.org> <838uex1u1m.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426606799 29902 80.91.229.3 (17 Mar 2015 15:39:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 17 16:39:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YXtYu-0002uM-PK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:37:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55536 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXtYu-0006kb-2a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:37:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53501) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXtUi-0008GH-Jz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:33:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXtUe-0004lk-SY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:33:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:60659) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXtUe-0004lA-LW; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLD00H004IMBT00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:33:19 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLD00HJ44JI6F70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:33:19 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183957 Archived-At: > From: Yuri Khan > Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:15:46 +0600 > Cc: Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , > Daniel Colascione , Emacs developers > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > > > The reason I implemented 'intangible' was for the sake of editing > > forms. A form has fields to be edited, and fixed text that shouldn't > > be changed. But there is no need to put point within the fixed text; > > allowing that seems ugly. > > There are in fact plenty of reasons to be able to move point all over > the form. You can accomplish that by let-binding inhibit-point-motion-hooks.