From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:23:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83r3q2xa3q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> <831ti2yu1a.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E28A.5040507@yandex.ru> <83wpzuxbtd.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E8AB.5020107@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432743931 22561 80.91.229.3 (27 May 2015 16:25:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 16:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 27 18:25:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxe8u-00045d-2F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 18:25:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54726 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxe8t-0003lQ-CY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:25:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57707) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxe8j-0003Zi-Jo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxe8f-0002lV-AC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxe8f-0002kg-7u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxe8e-00045N-8Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:25:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 16:25:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.143274387615662 (code B ref 20629); Wed, 27 May 2015 16:25:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2015 16:24:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58558 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxe8C-00044X-F7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:24:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:40399) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxe89-00044I-Ok for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:24:35 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NP000I00NSI0S00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 19:15:31 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NP000DOVNTUOY40@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Wed, 27 May 2015 19:15:31 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5565E8AB.5020107@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103229 Archived-At: > Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:54:19 +0300 > > On 05/27/2015 06:46 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Maybe I'm confused, but what about tag-exact-match-p? > > We collect matches that satisfy either tag-exact-match-p, or > tag-implicit-name-match-p. Yes, but they look at different parts of the tag's record. > > Yes, we did. That's what the -Q switch controls. > > Okay, but we match those tags with tag-implicit-name-match-p, don't we? No, we match them with tag-exact-match-p, AFAICS. > The result would be that the completion table only returns qualified > method names, but xref-find-definitions (or find-tag) also shows matches > for unqualified method names. That'd be great.