From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20839: 25.0.50; file-in-directory-p doesn't understand windows backslashes Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:31:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83r3p9l8o5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zj3ykt9z.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1434616356 23891 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2015 08:32:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20839@debbugs.gnu.org To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 18 10:32:25 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5VFA-00074J-KI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:32:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50882 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5VF4-0005gp-U5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:32:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50525) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5VF0-0005dL-Cx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5VEw-000521-AS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5VEw-00051q-7f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5VEw-0000nr-0B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20839 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 20839-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20839.14346163013058 (code B ref 20839); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20839) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2015 08:31:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5VEa-0000nD-VT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:31:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:35834) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5VEX-0000mu-G3 for 20839@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:31:39 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NQ400A00SGCTG00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 20839@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:23:05 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NQ4004BVSMGEY80@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:23:05 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104066 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:13:13 +0100 > From: Artur Malabarba > Cc: 20839@debbugs.gnu.org > > I was aiding someone remotely and I assumed this was the issue. I'll ask them > to file a bug report themselves. I see no bug report, and I suspect the user might be contempt with the "sledgehammer" (their word) solution mentioned there, and so that report will never materialize. Should we close this bug? Meanwhile, the offending line cited there, viz.: ((not (file-in-directory-p dir package-user-dir)) "external") has one more unknown, as far as I'm concerned: the value of 'dir'. That comes from this, AFAICS: (package-desc-dir pkg-desc) So it would e nice if the value that comes out of that on that user's system could be reported. Also, could any of the other packages that user loads overload the functions involved in calculating file-in-directory-p? Those are the ideas I had, anyway.